De Kovessey v. Coronet Properties Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

De Kovessey v. Coronet Properties Co.

119 A.D.2d 464, 500 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55413

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 8, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 119 A.D.2d 464 (De Kovessey v. Coronet Properties Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Kovessey v. Coronet Properties Co., 119 A.D.2d 464, 500 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55413 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Wright, J.), entered August 20, 1985, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, enjoined defendants from selling shares allocated to the subject apartment to any person other than plaintiff, tolled the deadline for plaintiff to purchase said shares, and awarded attorney’s fees to plaintiff, modified, on the law, to strike the award of attorney’s fees and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.

We modify the order at Special Term to the extent of striking the award of attorney’s fees, and otherwise affirm. (Matter of Wasserman, 127 Misc 2d 77 [Sur Ct, NY County 1985], affd without opn sub nom. Matter of Lipkowitz v Coronet Props. Co., 116 AD2d 1042 [1st Dept 1986].) There is no authority for an award of attorney’s fees under the facts and circumstances of the present case. (See, Klein v Sharp, 41 AD2d 926 [1st Dept 1973].) Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Lynch, Milonas and Rosenberger, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Wright, J.), entered August 20, 1985, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, enjoined defendants from selling shares allocated to the subject apartment to any person other than plaintiff, tolled the deadline for plaintiff to purchase said shares, and awarded attorney’s fees to plaintiff, modified, on the law, to strike the award of attorney’s fees and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.

We modify the order at Special Term to the extent of striking the award of attorney’s fees, and otherwise affirm. (Matter of Wasserman, 127 Misc 2d 77 [Sur Ct, NY County 1985], affd without opn sub nom. Matter of Lipkowitz v Coronet Props. Co., 116 AD2d 1042 [1st Dept 1986].) There is no authority for an award of attorney’s fees under the facts and circumstances of the present case. (See, Klein v Sharp, 41 AD2d 926 [1st Dept 1973].) Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Lynch, Milonas and Rosenberger, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 A.D.2d 464, 500 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-kovessey-v-coronet-properties-co-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack