De Hart v. De Hart
67 A. 1074, 70 N.J. Eq. 774, 4 Robb. 774, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 168
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.
For affirma'nce—The Chibe-Justice, Garrison, Poet, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill—14.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
De Hart v. De Hart, 67 A. 1074, 70 N.J. Eq. 774, 4 Robb. 774, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 168 (N.J. 1906).
67 A. 1074 (De Hart v. De Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
The First National Bank of Chicago, (Appellee and Cross-Appellant) v. Jefferson Mortgage Company, (Appellee and Cross-Appellee) v. J. I. Kislak Mortgage Company, Inc., (Appellant and Cross-Appellee)
576 F.2d 479 (First Circuit, 1978)
First National Bank of Chicago v. Jefferson Mortgage Co.
576 F.2d 479 (Third Circuit, 1978)
Blondeau v. Sommer
99 S.W.2d 668 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)