De Hart v. De Hart

67 A. 1074, 70 N.J. Eq. 774, 4 Robb. 774, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 168
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 18, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 67 A. 1074 (De Hart v. De Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
De Hart v. De Hart, 67 A. 1074, 70 N.J. Eq. 774, 4 Robb. 774, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 168 (N.J. 1906).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

For affirma'nce—The Chibe-Justice, Garrison, Poet, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill—14.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 A. 1074, 70 N.J. Eq. 774, 4 Robb. 774, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-hart-v-de-hart-nj-1906.