De Haas v. Newaygo Circuit Judge

8 N.W. 587, 46 Mich. 12
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 13, 1881·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Marston, C. J.

¥e are of opinion that the circuit judge should have settled a case for review in this court, but as he has since the answer was filed resigned, the writ as prayed for cannot be issued. The relator should apply to the present circuit judge for relief, who undoubtedly would grant a new trial, if upon examination he became satisfied that justice would be advanced thereby.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

De Haas v. Newaygo Circuit Judge, 8 N.W. 587, 46 Mich. 12 (Mich. 1881).

8 N.W. 587 (De Haas v. Newaygo Circuit Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mosley
197 N.W. 541 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1924)
State ex rel. Priddy v. Gibson
86 S.W. 177 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1905)