De H Nguyen v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 18, 2025·No. 03-23-00301-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00301-CR

De H Nguyen, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2020-060, THE HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM Appellant De Nguyen appeals his conviction for murder. See Tex. Penal Code § 19.02. Appellant challenges the legality of “Geofence warrants.” Nguyen notified this Court that a case “focusing on the same similar issues regarding Geofence warrants, was recently granted Petition for Discretionary Review in the Court of Criminal Appeals.” See Wells v. State, PD-0669-23 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 24, 2024). Appellant request that we delay our opinion until the Court of Criminal Appeals rules on the Geofence warrant issues in Wells. Petitioner’s brief in Wells represents the issue of the legality of Geofence warrants as an issue of first impression.

We grant the motion and abate this cause. See McCall v. State, No. 03-19-00027-

CR, 2021 WL 2371358, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin June 9, 2021, no pet.) (abating appeal pending resolution of separate cause pending in Texas Court of Criminal Appeals). Appellant should notify this Court within thirty days of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeal’s disposition of cause

No. PD-0669-23, though appellee may so inform this Court and this Court may reinstate this appeal on its own motion.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly Abated Filed: March 18, 2025 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

De H Nguyen v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

De H Nguyen v. the State of Texas (De H Nguyen v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 19.02
Texas PE § 19.02