De Guzman v. NIH Federal Credit Union

Fourth Circuit

De Guzman v. NIH Federal Credit Union

399 F. App'x 787

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2010·No. No. 10-1825·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn de Guzman appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on her employment discrimination and retaliation claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Guzman v. NIH Fed. Credit Union, No. 8:08-cv-03213-PJM, 2010 WL 2802127 (D.Md. July 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn de Guzman appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on her employment discrimination and retaliation claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Guzman v. NIH Fed. Credit Union, No. 8:08-cv-03213-PJM, 2010 WL 2802127 (D.Md. July 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

De Guzman v. NIH Federal Credit Union, 399 F. App'x 787 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

399 F. App'x 787 (De Guzman v. NIH Federal Credit Union) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.