De Grazia v. Ferretti

City of New York Municipal Court

De Grazia v. Ferretti

31 Misc. 805, 62 N.Y.S. 1124

DecidedMarch 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 31 Misc. 805 (De Grazia v. Ferretti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Grazia v. Ferretti, 31 Misc. 805, 62 N.Y.S. 1124 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think that the exceptions taken during the trial are without merit. The writing on the back of the lease was properly excluded. The statements in the answer set forth, a' separate special defense and do not amount to a counterclaim requiring a reply. The remark of counsel that an offer of judgment had been made, being addressed to the court, did not in any way affect the interests of the defendants with the jury.

The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Oh. J., Conlan and O’Dwyer, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We think that the exceptions taken during the trial are without merit. The writing on the back of the lease was properly excluded. The statements in the answer set forth, a' separate special defense and do not amount to a counterclaim requiring a reply. The remark of counsel that an offer of judgment had been made, being addressed to the court, did not in any way affect the interests of the defendants with the jury.

The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Oh. J., Conlan and O’Dwyer, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Misc. 805, 62 N.Y.S. 1124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-grazia-v-ferretti-nynyccityct-1900.