de Gomez-Mena v. Coe
13 A.D.2d 924, 218 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10177
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1961
StatusPublished
This text of 13 A.D.2d 924 (de Gomez-Mena v. Coe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
de Gomez-Mena v. Coe, 13 A.D.2d 924, 218 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10177 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).
Opinion
Order and judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent. Concur — Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.; Steuer, J., dissents and votes to reverse and deny summary judgment on the ground that there are triable issues of fact. No opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 A.D.2d 924, 218 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-gomez-mena-v-coe-nyappdiv-1961.