De Geso v. State

866 So. 2d 107, 2004 WL 221081
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 6, 2004·No. 2D03-2502·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

866 So.2d 107 (2004)

Charles P. DE GESO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D03-2502.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 6, 2004.

STRINGER, Judge.

Charles De Geso challenges the trial court's order summarily dismissing his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the trial court erroneously dismissed the motion as untimely and did not reach the merits of De Geso's claims, we reverse.

On April 28, 1999, a jury found De Geso guilty of two counts of trafficking in cocaine. He was sentenced to eleven and a half years in prison. De Geso appealed, and on December 12, 2000, the mandate of this court issued in which his convictions were affirmed. His sentences were reversed, and the case was remanded. On February 15, 2001, De Geso was resentenced to concurrent terms of 83.2 months in prison. He did not appeal. This motion for postconviction relief was filed on February 18, 2003.

Rule 3.850(b) states that "[n]o other motion shall be filed or considered pursuant to this rule if filed more than 2 years after the judgment and sentence become final in a noncapital case...." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b) (emphasis added). Accordingly, De Geso had until roughly March 15, 2003, *108 to file a motion for postconviction relief. Therefore, his motion was timely filed.

Reversed and remanded.

COVINGTON and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

De Geso v. State, 866 So. 2d 107, 2004 WL 221081 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

866 So. 2d 107 (De Geso v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

WAITER v. State
965 So. 2d 861 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)