De Fernandez v. Seaboard Marine Ltd

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 2023
Docket1:20-cv-25176
StatusUnknown

This text of De Fernandez v. Seaboard Marine Ltd (De Fernandez v. Seaboard Marine Ltd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
De Fernandez v. Seaboard Marine Ltd, (S.D. Fla. 2023).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-cv-25176-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

ODETTE BLANCO DE FERNANDEZ née BLANCO ROSELL,

Plaintiff, v.

SEABOARD MARINE, LTD.,

Defendant. _____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Award of Costs, ECF No. [273], filed on September 19, 2022 (“Motion”). The Motion was previously referred to the Honorable Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes for a Report and Recommendations (“R&R”). See ECF No. [277]. On February 2, 2023, the Magistrate Judge issued a R&R recommending that the Motion be granted in part and denied in part. ECF No. [295]. The R&R states that the parties shall file any objections within fourteen days of the date of service of a copy of the R&R. Id. To date, neither party has filed objections. Nevertheless, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the R&R, the record in this case, and is otherwise fully advised. See Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1291 (11th Cir. 2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Upon review, the Court finds the R&R to be well reasoned and correct. The Court therefore agrees with the analysis in the R&R and concludes that the Motion must be granted in part and denied in part for the reasons set forth therein. Case No. 20-cv-25176-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The R&R, ECF No. [295], is ADOPTED; 2. The Motion, ECF No. [273], is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; 3. Defendant is awarded $27,799.65 in taxable costs as the prevailing party in this action. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on February 21, 2023.

BETH BLOOM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies to: Counsel of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. McNeil
557 F.3d 1287 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
De Fernandez v. Seaboard Marine Ltd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-fernandez-v-seaboard-marine-ltd-flsd-2023.