De Feo v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

De Feo v. New York City Transit Authority

101 A.D.2d 888, 476 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18601

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 29, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 A.D.2d 888 (De Feo v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Feo v. New York City Transit Authority, 101 A.D.2d 888, 476 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18601 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the president of the respondent New York City Transit Authority, dated May 12, 1983, which, after a hearing, sustained charges of misconduct and/or incompetence which had been filed against the petitioner and ordered that he be dismissed from his position as a bus operator. 11 Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. 11 The determination is supported by substantial evidence appearing on the record considered as a whole and is neither arbitrary nor capricious. We have considered the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit (see Matter of Eagle v Paterson, 57 NY2d 831; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc, v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). Gibbons, J. P., O’Connor, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the president of the respondent New York City Transit Authority, dated May 12, 1983, which, after a hearing, sustained charges of misconduct and/or incompetence which had been filed against the petitioner and ordered that he be dismissed from his position as a bus operator. 11 Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. 11 The determination is supported by substantial evidence appearing on the record considered as a whole and is neither arbitrary nor capricious. We have considered the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit (see Matter of Eagle v Paterson, 57 NY2d 831; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc, v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). Gibbons, J. P., O’Connor, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 A.D.2d 888, 476 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-feo-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack