De Felice v. Garon

Supreme Court of Louisiana

De Felice v. Garon

435 So. 2d 421, 1983 La. LEXIS 12571

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in De Felice v. Garon. Read the opinion of the Court — 395 So. 2d 658 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided August 9, 1983·No. No. 66993·Published

Opinion

DENNIS, Justice,

concurring.

I respectfully concur.

Because the record in this case has been found insufficient to support partial summary judgment in plaintiff’s favor, I concur in the remand to the trial court. Since I believe that the validity vel non of the “voting trust” contract is likely to retain significance in plaintiff’s claim for damages, I cannot fully endorse the majority’s treatment of the mootness issue. I must point out that this court has not ruled on the validity of the contract, and if trial proceeds on plaintiff’s claim for damages for wrongful interference, the trial court is not bound to uphold it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DENNIS, Justice,

concurring.

I respectfully concur.

Because the record in this case has been found insufficient to support partial summary judgment in plaintiff’s favor, I concur in the remand to the trial court. Since I believe that the validity vel non of the “voting trust” contract is likely to retain significance in plaintiff’s claim for damages, I cannot fully endorse the majority’s treatment of the mootness issue. I must point out that this court has not ruled on the validity of the contract, and if trial proceeds on plaintiff’s claim for damages for wrongful interference, the trial court is not bound to uphold it.

De Felice v. Garon, 435 So. 2d 421, 1983 La. LEXIS 12571 (La. 1983).

Pincite

435 So. 2d 421 (De Felice v. Garon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.