de Egana v. Jackson
This text of 5 La. 430 (de Egana v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the court was pronounced by
We concur with the district judge in the opinion, that the only amount for which Zacharie Sf Co. were liable, under their bond, was the amount for which the seizure issued, and that this amount was subsequently paid. We do not consider the evidence as proving a fraudulent combination to defeat the landlord, so as to bring the case within the ruling in Dennistoun v. Malard, 2 Ann. 16.
The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 La. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-egana-v-jackson-la-1850.