De Diaz v. Ashcroft
This text of 84 F. App'x 795 (De Diaz v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Leticia Limón Casiano De Diaz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review from a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals which summarily affirmed without opinion under 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7), the Immigration Judge’s denial of her request for suspension of deportation under § 244(a)(1). Diaz’s sole contention on appeal is that the BIA’s affirmance without opinion procedure under which the Immigration Judge’s decision was upheld violates due process. Diaz’s contention is foreclosed by this court’s decision in Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2003).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. The court sua sponte changes the docket to reflect that John Ashcroft, Attorney General, is the proper respondent. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect the above caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 F. App'x 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-diaz-v-ashcroft-ca9-2003.