Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/De Daniel Espuny v. Victor M. Calderon Co.

De Daniel Espuny v. Victor M. Calderon Co.

6 A.D.2d 697, 174 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5967
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 12, 1958
StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.2d 697 (De Daniel Espuny v. Victor M. Calderon Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
De Daniel Espuny v. Victor M. Calderon Co., 6 A.D.2d 697, 174 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5967 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for fraud and conspiracy, and for an accounting, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss each of the three causes of action pleaded in the amended complaint as insufficient in law (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [9 Misc 2d 983.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hijos De Daniel Espuny, S.A. v. Victor M. Calderon Co.
9 Misc. 2d 983 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 A.D.2d 697, 174 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-daniel-espuny-v-victor-m-calderon-co-nyappdiv-1958.