De Daniel Espuny v. Victor M. Calderon Co.
6 A.D.2d 697, 174 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5967
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for fraud and conspiracy, and for an accounting, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss each of the three causes of action pleaded in the amended complaint as insufficient in law (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [9 Misc 2d 983.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
De Daniel Espuny v. Victor M. Calderon Co., 6 A.D.2d 697, 174 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5967 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).
6 A.D.2d 697 (De Daniel Espuny v. Victor M. Calderon Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hijos De Daniel Espuny, S.A. v. Victor M. Calderon Co.
9 Misc. 2d 983 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)