Home/Supreme Court/De Csepel v. Republic of Hung.

De Csepel v. Republic of Hung.

139 S. Ct. 784, 202 L. Ed. 2d 621
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 7, 2019
DocketNo. 17–1165.
StatusPublished

This text of 139 S. Ct. 784 (De Csepel v. Republic of Hung.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
De Csepel v. Republic of Hung., 139 S. Ct. 784, 202 L. Ed. 2d 621 (U.S. 2019).

Opinion

Motion of Ambassador Stuart E. Eizenstat for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of AJC, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 S. Ct. 784, 202 L. Ed. 2d 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-csepel-v-republic-of-hung-scotus-2019.