De Crescenzo v. 274-276 Madison Avenue, Inc.
This text of 177 N.E. 169 (De Crescenzo v. 274-276 Madison Avenue, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the Trial Term reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts, on the ground that Labor Law, section 2.41, subdivision 5, as it read at the time of the accident, did not apply to hoisting apparatus not “ within a building ” and that no liability at common law was established; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 N.E. 169, 256 N.Y. 630, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 1220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-crescenzo-v-274-276-madison-avenue-inc-ny-1931.