De Cell v. City of New York
This text of 127 A.D.2d 557 (De Cell v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant H. B. Singer, Inc. (Held, J.), dated October 28, 1985, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs motion to amend his bill of particulars and to increase the ad damnum clause of the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Based on the facts of this case, we conclude that Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting the plaintiffs motion to amend his bill of particulars to allege additional injuries and to increase the ad damnum clause of the complaint (see, CPLR 3025 [b]; Dolan v Garden City Union Free School Dist., 113 AD2d 781). Niehoff, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 A.D.2d 557, 511 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-cell-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1987.