De Celis v. Brunson
53 Cal. 372
Opinion
The evidence establishes the existence of relations between the defendant and Eulogio F. de Celis such as prohibited the former from receiving compensation or profit from Maclay and others upon the sale .to them, and the findings of the Court below in respect to those relations, and the duties of defendant, are not sustained by the record.
Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial. Remittitur forthwith.
Mr. Chief Justice Wallace expressed no opinion in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
De Celis v. Brunson, 53 Cal. 372 (Cal. 1879).
53 Cal. 372 (De Celis v. Brunson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Elberta Oil Co. v. Superior Court
291 P. 668 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)
Strong v. International Building Loan & Invest. Union
47 L.R.A. 792 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1899)
Strong v. International B., L. & I. Union
82 Ill. App. 426 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1899)