De Celis v. Brunson

California Supreme Court

De Celis v. Brunson

53 Cal. 372

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1879

DocketNo. 5867

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 53 Cal. 372 (De Celis v. Brunson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Celis v. Brunson, 53 Cal. 372 (Cal. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

The evidence establishes the existence of relations between the defendant and Eulogio F. de Celis such as prohibited the former from receiving compensation or profit from Maclay and others upon the sale .to them, and the findings of the Court below in respect to those relations, and the duties of defendant, are not sustained by the record.

Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial. Remittitur forthwith.

Mr. Chief Justice Wallace expressed no opinion in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

The evidence establishes the existence of relations between the defendant and Eulogio F. de Celis such as prohibited the former from receiving compensation or profit from Maclay and others upon the sale .to them, and the findings of the Court below in respect to those relations, and the duties of defendant, are not sustained by the record.

Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial. Remittitur forthwith.

Mr. Chief Justice Wallace expressed no opinion in this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 Cal. 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-celis-v-brunson-cal-1879.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack