De Carlo v. Falco
168 N.E.2d 132, 8 N.Y.2d 791
Opinion
Judgment modified by dismissing the complaint as to defendants Palios and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to defendants Palios. The proof of Steve Palios ’ conduct, precipitated as it was by an emergency not of Ms own making, was as a matter of law insufficient to create liability (see Meyer v. Whisnant, 307 N. Y. 369; Andersen v. Bee Line, 1 N Y 2d 169). No opimon.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
De Carlo v. Falco, 168 N.E.2d 132, 8 N.Y.2d 791 (N.Y. 1960).
168 N.E.2d 132 (De Carlo v. Falco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Madden v. Mullet
211 A.D.2d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)