de Brueys v. Freret

Supreme Court of Louisiana

de Brueys v. Freret

18 La. Ann. 80

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 15, 1866

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 18 La. Ann. 80 (de Brueys v. Freret) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

de Brueys v. Freret, 18 La. Ann. 80 (La. 1866).

Pincite

Opinion

Hvman, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order of seizure and sale. The order was obtained by plaintiff as the administrator of the estate of the late Marie Eramjoise Adelide de Brueys, without evidence that he was the administrator.

The omission to produce such evidence is fatal. See case Joseph T. Landry, administrator, vs. C. S. Landry, executor, 12 An. 167.

It is therefore ordered and decreed that the fiat of the District Judge granting the order of seizure and sale in this case be set aside and avoided,, the ease dismissed and the plaintiff to pay costs of both Courts.

Howell, J., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hvman, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order of seizure and sale. The order was obtained by plaintiff as the administrator of the estate of the late Marie Eramjoise Adelide de Brueys, without evidence that he was the administrator.

The omission to produce such evidence is fatal. See case Joseph T. Landry, administrator, vs. C. S. Landry, executor, 12 An. 167.

It is therefore ordered and decreed that the fiat of the District Judge granting the order of seizure and sale in this case be set aside and avoided,, the ease dismissed and the plaintiff to pay costs of both Courts.

Howell, J., recused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 La. Ann. 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-brueys-v-freret-la-1866.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack