de Brueys v. Freret

18 La. Ann. 80
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 15, 1866·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Hvman, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order of seizure and sale. The order was obtained by plaintiff as the administrator of the estate of the late Marie Eramjoise Adelide de Brueys, without evidence that he was the administrator.

The omission to produce such evidence is fatal. See case Joseph T. Landry, administrator, vs. C. S. Landry, executor, 12 An. 167.

It is therefore ordered and decreed that the fiat of the District Judge granting the order of seizure and sale in this case be set aside and avoided,, the ease dismissed and the plaintiff to pay costs of both Courts.

Howell, J., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

de Brueys v. Freret, 18 La. Ann. 80 (La. 1866).

18 La. Ann. 80 (de Brueys v. Freret) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bertucci v. Augustine
518 So. 2d 1164 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1988)
Commercial Credit Corp. v. Vincent
251 So. 2d 63 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1971)
Tapp v. Guaranty Finance Company
158 So. 2d 228 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
Myrtle Grove Packing Company v. Mones
76 So. 2d 305 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1954)
Benjamin v. Cavaroc
3 F. Cas. 186 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana, 1875)