De Brodt v. Maceda Roofing Co.
This text of 43 A.D.2d 839 (De Brodt v. Maceda Roofing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 25, 1973, affirmed, without costs. Upon the argument of this appeal, respondent agreed that appellant’s expert could be present when her expert would make the inspection of the rope and that the reports of the experts be exchanged. The examination and testing of the rope shall proceed at the place directed in the order under review at a time to be specified in a written notice of not less than 10 days, to be given by plaintiff, or at such other time and place as may be agreed by the parties. Shapiro, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 A.D.2d 839, 351 N.Y.S.2d 644, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-brodt-v-maceda-roofing-co-nyappdiv-1974.