De Blasis v. Vestry of Addison Parish Diocese of Washington, Inc.

184 A.2d 840, 229 Md. 530, 1962 Md. LEXIS 592
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedOctober 22, 1962
Docket[No. 42, September Term, 1962.]
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 184 A.2d 840 (De Blasis v. Vestry of Addison Parish Diocese of Washington, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
De Blasis v. Vestry of Addison Parish Diocese of Washington, Inc., 184 A.2d 840, 229 Md. 530, 1962 Md. LEXIS 592 (Md. 1962).

Opinion

P®r Curiam.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Digges in the court below, in which he found no evidence of mistake in the original comprehensive zoning plan, nor that the character of the neighborhood had changed to such an extent that reclassification ought properly to be made (in which conclusions, after a careful review of the record before us, we concur, under the authority of Didlake v. Poteet, 228 Md. 588, 180 A. 2d 828, and Baltimore v. N. A. A. C. P., 221 Md. 329, 157 A. 2d 433), the order of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County reversing the order of the Board of County Commissioners, sitting as the District Council, which had granted the petition for rezoning, must be affirmed.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jay v. Smith
368 A.2d 487 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 A.2d 840, 229 Md. 530, 1962 Md. LEXIS 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-blasis-v-vestry-of-addison-parish-diocese-of-washington-inc-md-1962.