De Blasis v. Vestry of Addison Parish Diocese of Washington, Inc.

184 A.2d 840, 229 Md. 530, 1962 Md. LEXIS 592
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided October 22, 1962·No. [No. 42, September Term, 1962.]·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

P®r Curiam.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Digges in the court below, in which he found no evidence of mistake in the original comprehensive zoning plan, nor that the character of the neighborhood had changed to such an extent that reclassification ought properly to be made (in which conclusions, after a careful review of the record before us, we concur, under the authority of Didlake v. Poteet, 228 Md. 588, 180 A. 2d 828, and Baltimore v. N. A. A. C. P., 221 Md. 329, 157 A. 2d 433), the order of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County reversing the order of the Board of County Commissioners, sitting as the District Council, which had granted the petition for rezoning, must be affirmed.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

De Blasis v. Vestry of Addison Parish Diocese of Washington, Inc., 184 A.2d 840, 229 Md. 530, 1962 Md. LEXIS 592 (Md. 1962).

184 A.2d 840 (De Blasis v. Vestry of Addison Parish Diocese of Washington, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jay v. Smith
368 A.2d 487 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1977)