De Benedictxs v. Lind

2 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 11
CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island
DecidedNovember 26, 1918
DocketNo. 40595
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 11 (De Benedictxs v. Lind) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
De Benedictxs v. Lind, 2 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 11 (R.I. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

DECISION

TANNER, P. J.

This is an action of trover to recover the value of an automobile truck alleged to have been eonerted by the defendant.

The plaintiff let the defendant have the truck for the purpose of repairing it and putting in a new motor. This the defendant did and received a portion of the value of his work and materials furnished.

Defendant had pleaded a general issue and also specially that he claimed a lien upon the truck for the full value of the work done and materials furnished, and that no tender of the amount due had been made. This plea was traversed by the plaintiff.

It is clear from the testimony, that no legal tender was made of the balance due. -. The plaintiff, however, contends that the defendant converted the truck by using it for his own purposes after having repaired it. The evidence of use is very meagre. We do not think, however, that a reasonable use of the truck after the plaintiff declined to pay what was due amounts to a conversion.

28th Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, 2nd ed page 696, Note 3.

Under such circumstances we think the defendant might reasonably use the truck in return for storing and taking care of it.

Decision for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-benedictxs-v-lind-risuperct-1918.