De Benedictis v. Pryor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

De Benedictis v. Pryor

249 A.D. 830, 293 N.Y.S. 938, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9904

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 830 (De Benedictis v. Pryor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Benedictis v. Pryor, 249 A.D. 830, 293 N.Y.S. 938, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover the sum of ninety-six dollars for rent due and owing and for possession. Defendant interposed a counterclaim. It was conceded on the trial that defendant owed the amount claimed for rent. The jury brought in a verdict finding for plaintiff on his claim and for defendant on his counterclaim. The appeal is from the judgment entered on the verdict. Judgment of the County Court of Putnam county unanimously affirmed, with costs. Orders denying appellant’s motions to set aside the verdict and for a new trial unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover the sum of ninety-six dollars for rent due and owing and for possession. Defendant interposed a counterclaim. It was conceded on the trial that defendant owed the amount claimed for rent. The jury brought in a verdict finding for plaintiff on his claim and for defendant on his counterclaim. The appeal is from the judgment entered on the verdict. Judgment of the County Court of Putnam county unanimously affirmed, with costs. Orders denying appellant’s motions to set aside the verdict and for a new trial unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 830, 293 N.Y.S. 938, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-benedictis-v-pryor-nyappdiv-1937.