De Beaumon v. De Beaumon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

De Beaumon v. De Beaumon

118 A.D.2d 531, 499 N.Y.S.2d 158, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54400

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 118 A.D.2d 531 (De Beaumon v. De Beaumon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Beaumon v. De Beaumon, 118 A.D.2d 531, 499 N.Y.S.2d 158, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54400 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her notice of appeal and brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McGinity, J.), dated September 14, 1984, as (1) granted the [532]*532defendant husband a divorce on his counterclaim; (2) ordered that the parties have joint custody of the parties’ child; (3) awarded her child support of $75 per week; and (4) awarded the defendant husband certain property as an award of equitable distribution of the marital assets.

Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by increasing the award of child support in the fifth decretal paragraph thereof from $75 per week to $100 per week. As so modified, judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Since the plaintiff agreed to joint custody of the parties’ child at nisi prius, she cannot be heard to complain on appeal concerning that provision.

However, after considering the factors enumerated in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (7), we have concluded that the child support award to the plaintiff of $75 per week is inadequate and that an award of $100 per week is more appropriate (see, Durso v Durso, 106 AD2d 608; Johnson v Johnson, 104 AD2d 792; Lentz v Lentz, 103 AD2d 822; Marmorale v Marmorale, 103 AD2d 736). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her notice of appeal and brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McGinity, J.), dated September 14, 1984, as (1) granted the [532]*532defendant husband a divorce on his counterclaim; (2) ordered that the parties have joint custody of the parties’ child; (3) awarded her child support of $75 per week; and (4) awarded the defendant husband certain property as an award of equitable distribution of the marital assets.

Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by increasing the award of child support in the fifth decretal paragraph thereof from $75 per week to $100 per week. As so modified, judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Since the plaintiff agreed to joint custody of the parties’ child at nisi prius, she cannot be heard to complain on appeal concerning that provision.

However, after considering the factors enumerated in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (7), we have concluded that the child support award to the plaintiff of $75 per week is inadequate and that an award of $100 per week is more appropriate (see, Durso v Durso, 106 AD2d 608; Johnson v Johnson, 104 AD2d 792; Lentz v Lentz, 103 AD2d 822; Marmorale v Marmorale, 103 AD2d 736). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 A.D.2d 531, 499 N.Y.S.2d 158, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-beaumon-v-de-beaumon-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack