De Baril v. Pardo
8 A. 876, 6 Sadler 148, 20 Week. No. 65, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 603
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 11, 1887
DocketNo. 304, E. D.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 8 A. 876 (De Baril v. Pardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
De Baril v. Pardo, 8 A. 876, 6 Sadler 148, 20 Week. No. 65, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 603 (Pa. 1887).
Opinion
There is no error in this record. The action of the court in directing the jury to find in favor of the defendant is well sus[164]*164tained by the opinion of the learned judge in overruling the motion for a new trial.
The evidence relating to the letter and its contents was properly rejected.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McKnight v. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co.
61 A.2d 820 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)
Abercrombie Et Ux. v. Bailey
190 A. 725 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 A. 876, 6 Sadler 148, 20 Week. No. 65, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-baril-v-pardo-pa-1887.