De Baril v. Pardo
8 A. 876, 6 Sadler 148, 20 Week. No. 65, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 603
Opinion
There is no error in this record. The action of the court in directing the jury to find in favor of the defendant is well sus[164] tained by the opinion of the learned judge in overruling the motion for a new trial.
The evidence relating to the letter and its contents was properly rejected.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
De Baril v. Pardo, 8 A. 876, 6 Sadler 148, 20 Week. No. 65, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 603 (Pa. 1887).
8 A. 876 (De Baril v. Pardo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McKnight v. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co.
61 A.2d 820 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)
Abercrombie Et Ux. v. Bailey
190 A. 725 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)