De Bardeleben v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

De Bardeleben v. State

75 So. 629, 16 Ala. App. 81, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 145

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 15, 1917

Docket6 Div. 303.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 75 So. 629 (De Bardeleben v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Bardeleben v. State, 75 So. 629, 16 Ala. App. 81, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 145 (Ala. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The defendant was triedl on an indictment in two counts, one count charging grand larceny ¡and the other charging receiving stolen property, was convicted of grand larceny, and from the judgment appeals.

The transcript fails to set out the general1 charge of the court or the written charges given at the request of defendant; and in their absence this court will not consider the refused charges. Acts 1915, p. 815.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI