Home/Supreme Court of Alabama/De Bardeleben v. State

De Bardeleben v. State

78 So. 877, 201 Ala. 523, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 107
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 4, 1918
Docket5 Div. 700.
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 78 So. 877 (De Bardeleben v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
De Bardeleben v. State, 78 So. 877, 201 Ala. 523, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 107 (Ala. 1918).

Opinion

SAYRE, J.

This court is satisfied that the Court of Appeals has reached a correct conclusion on the two points brought into question by the application in this ease (De Bardeleben v. State, 77 South. 979), namely: (1) The admissibility of the testimony of the defendant’s wife; and (2) the admissibility of the entry made by the clerk of the circuit court going to show the quashal of a previous indictment and an order that another be preferred. In a proper proceeding and upon competent evidence the minutes of the court may yet be amended to show the judgment of the court in that matter, as the Court of Appeals has indicated.

Certiorari denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and GARDNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Radford v. State
726 So. 2d 756 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1998)
Ziglar v. State
629 So. 2d 43 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1993)
Moore v. State
539 So. 2d 416 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1988)
Bright v. State
485 So. 2d 398 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Ingle v. State
415 So. 2d 1225 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Hollingsworth v. State
411 So. 2d 858 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Arnold v. State
353 So. 2d 524 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1977)
Morton v. State
338 So. 2d 423 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1976)
Kilpatrick v. State
285 So. 2d 516 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1973)
Jordan v. State
5 So. 2d 110 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1941)
Taylor v. State
147 So. 647 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1933)
Miller v. State
80 So. 314 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 So. 877, 201 Ala. 523, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-bardeleben-v-state-ala-1918.