De Armond v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

De Armond v. State

1936 OK CR 139, 62 P.2d 1285, 60 Okla. Crim. 228, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 103

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 5, 1936

DocketNo. A-9104.

StatusPublished

This text of 1936 OK CR 139 (De Armond v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Armond v. State, 1936 OK CR 139, 62 P.2d 1285, 60 Okla. Crim. 228, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 103 (Okla. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted of conjoint robbery with firearms, and sentenced to be confined in the state penitentiary for a term of 50 years.

The record in this case was filed in this court on April 6, 1936; no brief has been filed in support of the defendant's assignment of errors. A careful examination of the record discloses no fundamental error. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict of the jury. The case is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted of conjoint robbery with firearms, and sentenced to be confined in the state penitentiary for a term of 50 years.

The record in this case was filed in this court on April 6, 1936; no brief has been filed in support of the defendant's assignment of errors. A careful examination of the record discloses no fundamental error. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict of the jury. The case is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1936 OK CR 139, 62 P.2d 1285, 60 Okla. Crim. 228, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-armond-v-state-oklacrimapp-1936.