De Areos v. So. Ca. Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

De Areos v. So. Ca. Insurance

13 S.C.L. 113

DecidedJanuary 15, 1822

StatusPublished

This text of 13 S.C.L. 113 (De Areos v. So. Ca. Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Areos v. So. Ca. Insurance, 13 S.C.L. 113 (S.C. 1822).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Richardson

delivered the opinion of the court:

I am of opinion that a new trial should be granted, in order that the charge of a wilful delay in the voyage may be further enquired into, and the case reconsidered, inasmuch as the testimony was unsatisfactory upon that pointy and therefore I deem it worthy of a second investigation before a jury.

Justices Huger, Gantt and Johnson, concurred. Colcock, Justice, dissented,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Richardson

delivered the opinion of the court:

I am of opinion that a new trial should be granted, in order that the charge of a wilful delay in the voyage may be further enquired into, and the case reconsidered, inasmuch as the testimony was unsatisfactory upon that pointy and therefore I deem it worthy of a second investigation before a jury.

Justices Huger, Gantt and Johnson, concurred. Colcock, Justice, dissented,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 S.C.L. 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-areos-v-so-ca-insurance-sc-1822.