De Areos v. So. Ca. Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

De Areos v. So. Ca. Insurance

13 S.C.L. 113

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 15, 1822·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Richardson

delivered the opinion of the court:

I am of opinion that a new trial should be granted, in order that the charge of a wilful delay in the voyage may be further enquired into, and the case reconsidered, inasmuch as the testimony was unsatisfactory upon that pointy and therefore I deem it worthy of a second investigation before a jury.

Justices Huger, Gantt and Johnson, concurred. Colcock, Justice, dissented,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Richardson

delivered the opinion of the court:

I am of opinion that a new trial should be granted, in order that the charge of a wilful delay in the voyage may be further enquired into, and the case reconsidered, inasmuch as the testimony was unsatisfactory upon that pointy and therefore I deem it worthy of a second investigation before a jury.

Justices Huger, Gantt and Johnson, concurred. Colcock, Justice, dissented,

De Areos v. So. Ca. Insurance, 13 S.C.L. 113 (S.C. 1822).

Pincite

13 S.C.L. 113 (De Areos v. So. Ca. Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.