De Andra Pye v. CO-I Robert Keener

2 F. App'x 626
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 7, 2001
Docket98-2234
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 F. App'x 626 (De Andra Pye v. CO-I Robert Keener) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
De Andra Pye v. CO-I Robert Keener, 2 F. App'x 626 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate De Andra Pye appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the Eastern District of Missouri following an adverse jury verdict in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Pye has moved for preparation of the trial transcript at government expense and for oral argument. We deny the former motion because Pye has not satisfied his burden of demonstrating that the appeal presents a substantial question. In particular, the trial evidence he points to is not contrary to the jury’s verdict. See Rhodes v. Corps of Eng’rs, 589 F.2d 358, 359-60 (8th Cir.1978) (per curiam) (denying transcript prepared at government expense where in forma pauperis appellant made only conclusory allegations that trial court erred in ruling against her). Because we are unable to review the issues Pye raises without a transcript, we deny Pye’s motion for oral argument and dismiss the appeal. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

1

. The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 F. App'x 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-andra-pye-v-co-i-robert-keener-ca8-2001.