D.D.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D.D.S. v. State

225 So. 3d 243, 2017 WL 2664691, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8984

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 21, 2017·No. No. 4D16-2676·Published

Opinion

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

Per Curiam.

The Defendant appeals an order committing him to a maximum-risk residential facility in four delinquency cases. The State concedes the Defendant does not [244]*244meet the criteria for commitment to a maximum-risk residential facility. See §§ 985.465, .494, Fla. Stat. (2016). In light of the State’s proper concession of error, we vacate the dispositions and remand for the circuit court to resentence the Defendant to a disposition authorized by law.

Disposition vacated and remanded for resentencing.

Forst, Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

Per Curiam.

The Defendant appeals an order committing him to a maximum-risk residential facility in four delinquency cases. The State concedes the Defendant does not [244]*244meet the criteria for commitment to a maximum-risk residential facility. See §§ 985.465, .494, Fla. Stat. (2016). In light of the State’s proper concession of error, we vacate the dispositions and remand for the circuit court to resentence the Defendant to a disposition authorized by law.

Disposition vacated and remanded for resentencing.

Forst, Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.

D.D.S. v. State, 225 So. 3d 243, 2017 WL 2664691, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8984 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

225 So. 3d 243 (D.D.S. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.