D.D.O. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D.D.O. v. State

557 So. 2d 103, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 687, 1990 WL 8640

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 6, 1990

DocketNo. 89-749

StatusPublished

This text of 557 So. 2d 103 (D.D.O. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D.D.O. v. State, 557 So. 2d 103, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 687, 1990 WL 8640 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Juvenile appeals an adjudication of delinquency for theft of an automobile and trespass of a conveyance. The State concedes properly that the evidence at trial was insufficient to prove that the Defendant had the requisite intent to be found guilty as charged, and we therefore reverse the adjudication of delinquency and remand for appropriate proceedings. See B.P. v. State, 515 So.2d 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); R.M. v. State, 450 So.2d 897 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); B.L.W. v. State, 393 So.2d 59 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Juvenile appeals an adjudication of delinquency for theft of an automobile and trespass of a conveyance. The State concedes properly that the evidence at trial was insufficient to prove that the Defendant had the requisite intent to be found guilty as charged, and we therefore reverse the adjudication of delinquency and remand for appropriate proceedings. See B.P. v. State, 515 So.2d 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); R.M. v. State, 450 So.2d 897 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); B.L.W. v. State, 393 So.2d 59 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

557 So. 2d 103, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 687, 1990 WL 8640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ddo-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack