DD & TJ, Inc. v. Estate of Sol Goldman

33 A.D.3d 497, 823 N.Y.S.2d 59
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 24, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 A.D.3d 497 (DD & TJ, Inc. v. Estate of Sol Goldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DD & TJ, Inc. v. Estate of Sol Goldman, 33 A.D.3d 497, 823 N.Y.S.2d 59 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered on or about August 11, 2005, which, in an action for property damages sustained by plaintiff tenant as a result of a defective roof, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants landlords’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The action is barred by the lease provision in which plaintiff agreed to take possession of the premises “in its ‘as is’ condition and to make all of the required repairs to the demised premises including repairing the roof.” Giving plaintiffs evidence every favorable inference, no issues of fact are raised as to whether defendants waived or should be estopped from asserting this “as is” clause (see Nassau Trust Co. v Montrose Concrete Prods. Corp., 56 NY2d 175, 184 [1982]). We have considered plaintiffs’ other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, EJ., Tom, Saxe, Sullivan and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

636 Apartment Associates, J v. v. Fleetridge East Owners, Inc.
139 A.D.3d 700 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 A.D.3d 497, 823 N.Y.S.2d 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dd-tj-inc-v-estate-of-sol-goldman-nyappdiv-2006.