DCPP VS. D.J.-B., A.E., AND K.B. IN THE MATTER OF E.V.E., E.J.E., K.B., JR., AND K.B.(FN-07-421-13, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(RECORD IMPOUNDED)
This text of DCPP VS. D.J.-B., A.E., AND K.B. IN THE MATTER OF E.V.E., E.J.E., K.B., JR., AND K.B.(FN-07-421-13, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(RECORD IMPOUNDED) (DCPP VS. D.J.-B., A.E., AND K.B. IN THE MATTER OF E.V.E., E.J.E., K.B., JR., AND K.B.(FN-07-421-13, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(RECORD IMPOUNDED)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
RECORD IMPOUNDED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3076-15T4
NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
D.J.-B.,
Defendant-Appellant,
and
A.E. and K.B.,
Defendants. ______________________________
IN THE MATTER OF E.V.E., E.J.E., K.B., Jr., and K.B.,
minors. ______________________________
Submitted May 23, 2017 – Decided May 31, 2017
Before Judges Reisner and Rothstadt.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Essex County, Docket No. FN-07-421-13.
Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Joan T. Buckley, Designated Counsel, on the brief). Christopher S. Porrino, Attorney General, attorney for respondent (Andrea M. Silkowitz, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).
Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, Law Guardian, attorney for minors (Melissa R. Vance, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
Defendant D.J.-B. appeals from a September 16, 2013 fact
finding order, determining that she abused or neglected her
daughter E.J.E.1 We affirm for the reasons stated in the trial
judge's September 16, 2013 oral opinion. We add these brief
comments.
The record clearly establishes that defendant brutally
assaulted and beat her daughter, leaving wounds and bruises. The
child's injuries are graphically depicted in photographs entered
in evidence at the fact finding hearing. Defendant also admitted
that, on occasion, she beat her other children as well. Contrary
to her appellate argument, defendant's decision to stop taking her
psychiatric medications does not excuse her infliction of
excessive corporal punishment on her daughter. The judge's
decision is supported by substantial credible evidence. N.J. Div.
of Child Prot. and Permanency v. L.W., 435 N.J. Super. 189, 195
1 On May 31, 2016, defendant voluntarily surrendered her parental rights to E.J.E. and three other children.
2 A-3076-15T4 (App. Div. 2014) (quoting Cesare v. Cesare, 154 N.J. 394, 413
(1998)). Defendant's arguments on this appeal are without
sufficient merit to warrant further discussion. R. 2:11-
3(e)(1)(E).
Affirmed.
3 A-3076-15T4
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
DCPP VS. D.J.-B., A.E., AND K.B. IN THE MATTER OF E.V.E., E.J.E., K.B., JR., AND K.B.(FN-07-421-13, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(RECORD IMPOUNDED), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dcpp-vs-dj-b-ae-and-kb-in-the-matter-of-eve-eje-kb-njsuperctappdiv-2017.