D.C. v. State

907 So. 2d 1292, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12550, 2005 WL 1925707
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 12, 2005
DocketNo. 3D05-1909
StatusPublished

This text of 907 So. 2d 1292 (D.C. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D.C. v. State, 907 So. 2d 1292, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12550, 2005 WL 1925707 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

D.C. petitions for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the trial court’s order confining her in secure detention. Based on the state’s appropriate confession of error, we grant the petition and order D.C. released to home detention forthwith.

Based on the properly calculated Risk Assessment Instrument, D.C. only scores a total of ten points, qualifying her for non-secure, or home detention. See § 985.213(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004); S.W. v. Woolsey, 673 So.2d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The court erred in imposing secure detention.

Habeas corpus granted. Petitioner to be released forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SW v. Woolsey
673 So. 2d 152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
907 So. 2d 1292, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12550, 2005 WL 1925707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dc-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.