D.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D.C. v. State

807 So. 2d 198, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1787

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 2002·No. No. 4D01-2909·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the delinquency disposition order withholding adjudication and placing Appellant on probation. Appellant, as a result of the state’s delay in serving him, was not arraigned until forty three (43) days after expiration of the ninety (90) day speedy trial period allotted from the date of his arrest. During that time, he was in the custody of the Department of Juvenile Justice. The state acknowledges that it was error to deny Appellant’s motion to dismiss. R.K. v. State, 778 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.090.

We remand with direction to vacate the order and for discharge Appellant accordingly.

STONE, WARNER, and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the delinquency disposition order withholding adjudication and placing Appellant on probation. Appellant, as a result of the state’s delay in serving him, was not arraigned until forty three (43) days after expiration of the ninety (90) day speedy trial period allotted from the date of his arrest. During that time, he was in the custody of the Department of Juvenile Justice. The state acknowledges that it was error to deny Appellant’s motion to dismiss. R.K. v. State, 778 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.090.

We remand with direction to vacate the order and for discharge Appellant accordingly.

STONE, WARNER, and FARMER, JJ., concur.

D.C. v. State, 807 So. 2d 198, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1787 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

807 So. 2d 198 (D.C. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related