D.C. v. State
728 So. 2d 1221, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4195, 1999 WL 176529
This text of 728 So. 2d 1221 (D.C. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D.C. v. State, 728 So. 2d 1221, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4195, 1999 WL 176529 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
Opinion
Appellant complains on appeal that the lower court erred in allowing testimony from a previously unidentified witness to rebut appellant’s alibi defense.' No objection was made to the trial court. This plainly is not a fundamental error.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
728 So. 2d 1221, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4195, 1999 WL 176529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dc-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.