D.C. v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California·Decided April 2, 2020·No. 3:15-cv-01868·Unknown

Opinion

D.C., a minor by and through his Case No. 15-cv-1868-MMA (NLS) Guardian Ad Litem, HELEN GARTER, on behalf of himself and all others ORDER GRANTING JOINT similarly situated, MOTION TO STAY ACTION PENDING RESOLUTION OF Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S PETITION FOR v. WRIT OF CERTIORARI

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; JESSIE [Doc. No. 96] POLINSKY CHILDREN'S CENTER; and SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND Defendants. The parties jointly move to stay this action pending a resolution of Plaintiff’s forthcoming Petition to the United States Supreme Court for a Writ of Certiorari of this Court’s order denying class certification (“Petition”). See Doc. No. 96. Weighing the competing interests, the Court GRANTS the parties’ joint motion and STAYS this action pending a resolution of Plaintiff’s Petition. See Lockyer v. Mirant Corp., 398 F.3d 1098, 1109 (9th Cir. 2005) (“A district court has discretionary power to stay proceedings in its own court . . . .”); id. at 1110 (listing the “competing interests” weighed when deciding whether to issue a stay). The Court ORDERS that the parties submit a joint status report within 5 days of the Petition’s resolution. Dated: April 2, 2020 Maku lu (lilt HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D.C. v. County of San Diego, (S.D. Cal. 2020).

D.C. v. County of San Diego (D.C. v. County of San Diego) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.
398 F.3d 1098 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)