DB SURGICAL, INC. v. Fowler
This text of 996 So. 2d 953 (DB SURGICAL, INC. v. Fowler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DB SURGICAL, INC. and Zenith Insurance Company, Petitioners,
v.
Gene FOWLER, Jr., Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Warren K. Sponsler, Sponsler, Bennett, Jacobs & Adams, P.A., Tampa, for Petitioners.
Laurie Thrower Miles, Smith, Feddeler, Smith & Miles, Lakeland, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Because Petitioners have not shown a departure from the essential requirements of law, or any material harm, the petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED on its merits. See e.g., Fla. Fish & Wildlife Comm'n v. Pringle, 770 So.2d 696, 697 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
LEWIS and THOMAS, JJ., and LAWRENCE, JR., L. ARTHUR, Senior Judge, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
996 So. 2d 953, 2008 WL 5191673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/db-surgical-inc-v-fowler-fladistctapp-2008.