Dayton v. State
This text of 2009 Ohio 4119 (Dayton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Dayton v. State, 122 Ohio St.3d 544, 2009-Ohio-4119.]
THE CITY OF DAYTON, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Dayton v. State, 122 Ohio St.3d 544, 2009-Ohio-4119.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of Lima v. State. (No. 2008-1252 — Submitted July 14, 2009 — Decided August 20, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 22221, 176 Ohio App.3d 469, 2008-Ohio-2589. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Lima v. State, 122 Ohio St.3d 155, 2009-Ohio-2597, 909 N.E.2d 616. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, and CUPP, JJ., concur. LANZINGER, J., dissents. __________________ Green & Green, Thomas M. Green, Jane M. Lynch, and Jared A. Wagner, for appellant. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, Benjamin C. Mizer, Solicitor General, Michael L. Stokes, Assistant Solicitor, and Pearl M. Chin and Sharon A. Jennings, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee state of Ohio. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2009 Ohio 4119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dayton-v-state-ohio-2009.