Dayton v. Oyama

24 So. 2d 363, 156 Fla. 784, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 617
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 11, 1946
StatusPublished

This text of 24 So. 2d 363 (Dayton v. Oyama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dayton v. Oyama, 24 So. 2d 363, 156 Fla. 784, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 617 (Fla. 1946).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

No reversible error being made to appear, the decree of dismissal is affirmed.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 So. 2d 363, 156 Fla. 784, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dayton-v-oyama-fla-1946.