Dayton v. CSX Transp., Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Dayton v. CSX Transp., Inc.

1 N.E.3d 431, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1466

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 9, 2014·No. 2013-1918·Published

Opinion

Lucas App. No. L-12-1038, 2013-Ohio-3845. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Michael T. Blotevogel, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

It is further ordered that counsel shall file a notice in this case, which has attached to it an unexpired certificate of pro hac vice registration, within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to file the notice within 30 days shall result in automatic revocation of the pro hac vice status.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucas App. No. L-12-1038, 2013-Ohio-3845. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Michael T. Blotevogel, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

It is further ordered that counsel shall file a notice in this case, which has attached to it an unexpired certificate of pro hac vice registration, within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to file the notice within 30 days shall result in automatic revocation of the pro hac vice status.

Dayton v. CSX Transp., Inc., 1 N.E.3d 431, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1466 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

1 N.E.3d 431 (Dayton v. CSX Transp., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.