Dayton Leissner v. Gary C. Ford and John Marcus Beatty
Opinion
NUMBER 13-25-00344-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
DAYTON LEISSNER, Appellant,
v.
GARY C. FORD AND JOHN MARCUS BEATTY, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________
ON APPEAL FROM THE 23RD DISTRICT COURT OF MATAGORDA COUNTY, TEXAS ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Silva, Peña, and Cron Memorandum Opinion by Justice Cron
This matter is before the Court on appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss appeal.
Appellant no longer desires to pursue the appeal and has conferred with appellees who
do not oppose the dismissal. The Court, having considered the unopposed motion to dismiss appeal, is of the
opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, the
unopposed motion to dismiss appeal is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. In
accordance with the unopposed motion, costs are taxed against the party incurring the
same. Having dismissed the appeal at the appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing
will be entertained.
JENNY CRON Justice
Delivered and filed on the 21st day of August, 2025.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dayton Leissner v. Gary C. Ford and John Marcus Beatty (Dayton Leissner v. Gary C. Ford and John Marcus Beatty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.