Dayton Leissner v. Gary C. Ford and John Marcus Beatty

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 21, 2025·No. 13-25-00344-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-25-00344-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

DAYTON LEISSNER, Appellant,

v.

GARY C. FORD AND JOHN MARCUS BEATTY, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________

ON APPEAL FROM THE 23RD DISTRICT COURT OF MATAGORDA COUNTY, TEXAS ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Silva, Peña, and Cron Memorandum Opinion by Justice Cron

This matter is before the Court on appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss appeal.

Appellant no longer desires to pursue the appeal and has conferred with appellees who

do not oppose the dismissal. The Court, having considered the unopposed motion to dismiss appeal, is of the

opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, the

unopposed motion to dismiss appeal is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. In

accordance with the unopposed motion, costs are taxed against the party incurring the

same. Having dismissed the appeal at the appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing

will be entertained.

JENNY CRON Justice

Delivered and filed on the 21st day of August, 2025.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dayton Leissner v. Gary C. Ford and John Marcus Beatty, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Dayton Leissner v. Gary C. Ford and John Marcus Beatty (Dayton Leissner v. Gary C. Ford and John Marcus Beatty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.