Dayton Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Dayton Co. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 315

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 24, 1955

DocketNo. 58867; protests 42159-K, etc. (Minneapolis)

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Cust. Ct. 315 (Dayton Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dayton Co. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 315 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

[316]*316Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in Mamary Bros., Inc. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[316]*316Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in Mamary Bros., Inc. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Cust. Ct. 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dayton-co-v-united-states-cusc-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack