Dayton (City) v. Pub. Util. Com.

Ohio Supreme Court

Dayton (City) v. Pub. Util. Com.

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 516

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 2, 1924

DocketNo. 18471

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 516 (Dayton (City) v. Pub. Util. Com.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dayton (City) v. Pub. Util. Com., 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 516 (Ohio 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

There is pending before the Public Utilities Commission a case to fix telephone rates in the City of Dayton, commenced prior to April 14, 1923, and still undetermined. The rates prevailing in Dalton were fixed by order of the Public Utilities Commission, and under Sec. 614-23 GC can be changed only by another order after a hearing. By the amendment of Section 614-20, passed April 14, 1923, provision is made for the change of rates fixed by order of the Commission by the filing of schedules. The Ohio Bell Telephone Company, under favor of this amendment, Las filed a new schedule which has gone into effect after suspension of one hundred and twenty days, under a bond to repay the excess if the rates shall finally be found to be excessive. The error proceeding brings up for review the orders made by the Commission with reference to this schedule, putting same into effect under bond and is expected to determine the legal status of the schedule as filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

There is pending before the Public Utilities Commission a case to fix telephone rates in the City of Dayton, commenced prior to April 14, 1923, and still undetermined. The rates prevailing in Dalton were fixed by order of the Public Utilities Commission, and under Sec. 614-23 GC can be changed only by another order after a hearing. By the amendment of Section 614-20, passed April 14, 1923, provision is made for the change of rates fixed by order of the Commission by the filing of schedules. The Ohio Bell Telephone Company, under favor of this amendment, Las filed a new schedule which has gone into effect after suspension of one hundred and twenty days, under a bond to repay the excess if the rates shall finally be found to be excessive. The error proceeding brings up for review the orders made by the Commission with reference to this schedule, putting same into effect under bond and is expected to determine the legal status of the schedule as filed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dayton-city-v-pub-util-com-ohio-1924.