Dayton Bar Assn. v. Wilcoxson

2017 Ohio 7157, 81 N.E.3d 1265, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1282
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 10, 2017·No. 2017-0663·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of a request for reinstatement by respondent, Clinton Ralph Wilcoxson II. The request was not opposed.

{¶ 2} Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that the request is granted and that respondent, Clinton Ralph Wilcoxson II, Attorney Registration No. 0061974, last known address in Vandalia, Ohio, is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that the reinstatement of *1283 respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent.

{¶ 3} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

{¶ 4} For earlier case, see Dayton Bar Assn. v. Wilcoxson, 150 Ohio St.3d 1274, 2017-Ohio-4206, 81 N.E.3d 1259.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Wilcoxson, 2017 Ohio 7157, 81 N.E.3d 1265, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1282 (Ohio 2017).

2017 Ohio 7157 (Dayton Bar Assn. v. Wilcoxson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dayton Bar Association v. Wilcoxson.
2018 Ohio 2699 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2018)