Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Truman

Ohio Supreme Court

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Truman

672 N.E.2d 173, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1217, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2363

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 8, 1996

DocketNo. 95-1194

StatusPublished

This text of 672 N.E.2d 173 (Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Truman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Truman, 672 N.E.2d 173, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1217, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2363 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Vance Paul Truman, Attorney Registration No. 0061526, last known address in Beaumont, Texas.

The court coming now to consider its order of October 25, 1995, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year with the final six months suspended on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that Vance Paul Truman be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Dayton Bar Assn. v. Truman (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 4, 655 N.E.2d 729.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI