Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Rab

Ohio Supreme Court

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Rab

643 N.E.2d 95, 71 Ohio St. 3d 206, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2835

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 20, 1994·No. No. 94-972·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendations. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years, with one year of that suspension suspended, and he is placed on monitored probation for one year to be monitored by an attorney appointed to perform the duties required by Gov.Bar R. V(9)(B). In addition, respondent must continue his current course of psychological counseling until such time as he is released by his psychologist. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendations. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years, with one year of that suspension suspended, and he is placed on monitored probation for one year to be monitored by an attorney appointed to perform the duties required by Gov.Bar R. V(9)(B). In addition, respondent must continue his current course of psychological counseling until such time as he is released by his psychologist. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Rab, 643 N.E.2d 95, 71 Ohio St. 3d 206, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2835 (Ohio 1994).

Pincite

643 N.E.2d 95 (Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Rab) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.