Dayton Bar Ass'n v. O'Neal
648 N.E.2d 1344, 72 Ohio St. 3d 234
Opinions
Having reviewed the record, we concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 6 — 101(A)(2) and (3), and in its recommendation. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six-months, but this sanction is suspended on the condition that he complete a two-year probation period and that, during this period, no complaints against him have been certified to the board by a probable cause panel. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. O'Neal, 648 N.E.2d 1344, 72 Ohio St. 3d 234 (Ohio 1995).
648 N.E.2d 1344 (Dayton Bar Ass'n v. O'Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dayton Bar Assn. v. O'Neal
2012 Ohio 5634 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)